![]() While I can appreciate that I inspired you to write two paragraphs of sarcasm, if you look closely at what I wrote I didn't leave it ambiguous which one is better. I'm gonna have to agree with you that Chess is the game for children. And uses religious bishops, and non-military queens as combat units that can fight legitimate military forces. Surrounding your opponent and leaving them with no moves creates a stalemate (not joking this is a real rule) and doesn't count as a win. Has players waging wars with no back up plans or hierarchies if their leader is captured. Meanwhile with chess we have an antiquated system that's no longer considered a smart form of government. just like how it would be in a nuclear war. It adequately demonstrates many critical real-life lessons such as how you can't win except against people severely bad at the game and how the winning move is not to play. See how that works? One is a great game and the other is for little kids. It's better than tic-tac-toe and not better than chess. I wonder how you compare it to chess or tic-tac-toe.Įasy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |